4.6 Article

NK cells play a critical role in the regulation of class I-deficient hemopoietic stem cell engraftment: Evidence for NK tolerance correlates with receptor editing

Journal

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 175, Issue 6, Pages 3753-3761

Publisher

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.6.3753

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL63442] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK52294] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The role that NK cells play in the rejection of hemopoietic stem cell (HSC) and tolerance induction has remained controversial. In this study, we examined whether NK cells play a direct role in the rejection of HSC. Purified HSC from MHC class II-deficient mice engrafted readily in congenic mice, while HSC from class I-deficient donors (beta(2)-microglobulin(-/-) failed to engraft. Recipient mice lacking CD8(+), CD4(+), or T cells also rejected HSC from class I-deficient donors, pointing directly to NK cells as the effector in rejection of HSC. Recipients, deficient in or depleted of NK cells, engrafted readily with beta(2)m(-/-) HSC. Expression of the activating Ly-49D and inhibitory Ly-49G2 receptors on recipient NK cells was significantly decreased in these beta(2)m(-/-) -> B6 chimeras, and the proportion of donor NK cells expressing Ly-49D was also significantly decreased. Notably, beta(2)m(-/-) chimeras accepted beta(2)m(-/-) HSC in second transplants, demonstrating that NK cells in the chimeras had been tolerized to beta(2)m(-/-). Taken together, our data demonstrate that NK cells play a direct role in the regulation of HSC engraftment, and down-regulation and/or deletion of specific NK subsets in mixed chimeras can contribute to the induction of NK cell tolerance in vivo. Moreover, our data show that bone marrow-derived elements significantly contribute to NK cell development and tolerance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available