4.7 Article

Velocity centroids as tracers of the turbulent velocity statistics

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 631, Issue 1, Pages 320-350

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/432458

Keywords

ISM : general; ISM : structure; MHD; radio lines : ISM; turbulence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We use the results of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations to emulate spectroscopic observations and use maps of centroids to study their statistics. In order to assess under which circumstances the scaling properties of the velocity field can be retrieved from velocity centroids, we compare two-point statistics (structure functions and power spectra) of velocity centroids with those of the underlying velocity field and analytic predictions presented by us in a previous paper. We tested a criterion for recovering velocity spectral index from velocity centroids derived in our previous work and propose an approximation of the early criterion using only the variances of unnormalized'' velocity centroids and column density maps. It was found that both criteria are necessary, but not sufficient, to determine if the centroids recover velocity statistics. Both criteria are well fulfilled for subsonic turbulence. We find that for supersonic turbulence with sonic Mach numbers M-s >= 2.5, centroids fail to trace the spectral index of velocity. Asymptotically, however, we claim that recovery of velocity statistics is always possible provided that the density spectrum is steep and the observed inertial range is sufficiently extended. In addition, we show that velocity centroids are useful for anisotropy studies and determining the direction of the magnetic field, even if the turbulence is highly supersonic, but only if it is sub-Alfvenic. This provides a tool for mapping the magnetic field direction and for testing whether the turbulence is sub-Alfvenic or super-Alfvenic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available