4.4 Article

Hybrid density functional study of organic magnetic crystals:: bi-metallic CrIII cyanides and rhombohedral C60

Journal

MOLECULAR PHYSICS
Volume 103, Issue 18, Pages 2573-2585

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00268970500178869

Keywords

organic magnetic crystals; hybrid density functional study; Bi-metallic Cr-III; cyanides; rhombohedral C-60

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Periodic hybrid-exchange density functional theory calculations have been used to investigate the magnetic properties of two classes of organic magnets, namely the bi-metallic Cr-III cyanides and the polymerized rhombohedral C-60 fullerenes (Rh-C-60). For the systems KMII[Cr-III(CN)(6)] with M-II = V, Mn, Ni and Cr-III[Cr-III(CN)(6)], the magnetic ordering energies, Mulliken populations, and spin density plots are reported for the optimized geometries. The qualitative nature of the magnetic coupling mechanism is consistent with that observed in previous unrestricted Hartree-Fock calculations, but the coupling energies computed here are signicantly higher. The increased coupling is found to be a result of both changes in the geometry and the electronic structure resulting from the more reliable treatment of electronic exchange and correlation effects. The existence of long-range coupling between local spin moments is investigated in three different defective Rh-C-60 structures: (i) a previously proposed prototype structure, where an atom is removed from the C-60 cage; (ii) a related structure in which vacancies in nearby cages are brought closer together in pairs; and (iii) a structure where the intra-fullerene bond between the two inter-fullerene bonds is broken spontaneously after applying isotropic pressure to one layer of the Rh-C-60 structure. All of these structures are characterized by low flat spin polarized bands at the Fermi edge and localized spin moments around the defects, but no evidence of long-range magnetic coupling is found.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available