4.6 Article

Regulation of actin ring formation by Rho GTPases in Osteoclasts

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 280, Issue 38, Pages 32930-32943

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M500154200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAMS NIH HHS [R01-AR46292] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Actin ring formation is a prerequisite for osteoclast bone resorption. Although gelsolin null osteoclasts failed to exhibit podosomes, actin ring was observed in these osteoclasts. Wiscott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) was observed in the actin ring of gelsolin null osteoclast. Osteoclasts stimulated with osteopontin simulated the effects of Rho and Cdc42 in phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) association with WASP as well as formation of podosomes, peripheral microfilopodia-like structures, and actin ring. To explore the potential functions of Rho and Cdc42, TAT-mediated delivery of Rho proteins into osteoclasts was performed. Although Rho and Cdc42 are required for actin ring formation, transduction of either one of the proteins alone is insufficient for this process. Addition of osteopontin to osteoclasts transduced with Cdc42(Val12) or transduction of osteoclasts with both Rho(Val14) and Cdc42(Val12) augments the formation of WASP-Arp2/3 complex and actin ring. Neomycin, an antibiotic, blocked the effects of osteopontin or TAT-Rho(Val14) on PIP2 interaction with WASP. WASP distribution was found to be cytosolic in these osteoclasts. Depletion of WASP by short interfering RNA-mediated gene silencing blocked actin polymerization as well as actin ring formation in osteoclasts. These results suggest that Rho-mediated PIP2 interaction with WASP may contribute to the activation and membrane targeting of WASP. Subsequent interaction of Cdc42 and Arp2/3 with WASP may enhance cortical actin polymerization in the process of actin ring formation in osteoclasts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available