4.6 Article

Subtype-selective interaction with the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) homologous protein (CHOP) regulates cell surface expression of GABAB receptors

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 280, Issue 39, Pages 33566-33572

Publisher

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M503482200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The metabotropic gamma-aminobutyric acid, type B (GABA(B)) receptors mediate the slow component of GABAergic transmission in the brain. Functional GABA(B) receptors are heterodimers of the two subunits GABA(B1) and GABA(B2), of which GABA(B1) exists in two main isoforms, GABA(B1a) and GABA(B1b). The significance of the structural heterogeneity of GABAB receptors, the mechanism leading to their differential targeting in neurons as well as the regulation of cell surface numbers of GABAB receptors, is poorly understood. To gain insights into these processes, we searched for proteins interacting with the C-terminal domain of GABA(B2). Here, we showed that the transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) homologous protein ( CHOP) directly interacts with GABA(B) receptors in a subtype-selective manner to regulate cell surface expression of GABA(B1a)/GABA(B2) receptors upon co-expression in HEK293 cells. The interaction of CHOP with GABA(B1a)/ GABA(B2) receptors resulted in their intracellular accumulation and in a reduced number of cell surface receptors. This regulation required the interaction of CHOP via two distinct domains with the heterodimeric receptor; its C-terminal leucine zipper associates with the leucine zipper present in the C-terminal domain of GABA(B2), and its N-terminal domain associates with an as yet unidentified site on GABA(B1a). In conclusion, the data indicated a subtype-selective regulation of cell surface receptors by interaction with the transcription factor CHOP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available