4.7 Article

Principal component and multiple regression analysis in modelling of ground-level ozone and factors affecting its concentrations

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages 1263-1271

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.09.001

Keywords

statistical analysis; principal component analysis; regression analysis; variable selection methods

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data on the concentrations of seven environmental pollutants (CH4. NMHC, CO, CO2, NO, NO2 and SO2) and meteorological variables(wind speed and direction, air temperature, relative humidity and solar radiation) were employed to predict the concentration of ozone in the atmosphere using both multiple linear and principal component regression methods. Separate analyses were carried out for day light and night time periods. For both periods the pollutants were highly correlated, but were all negatively correlated with ozone. Multiple regression analysis was used to fit the ozone data using the pollutant and meteorological variables as predictors. A variable selection method based on high loadings of varimax rotated principal components was used to obtain subsets of the predictor variables to be included in the regression model of the logarithm of the ozone data. It was found that while high temperature and high solar energy tended to increase the day time ozone concentrations, the pollutants NO and SO2 being emitted to the atmosphere were being depleted. Night time ozone concentrations were influenced predominantly by the nitrogen oxides (NO+NO,), with the meteorological variables playing no significant role. However, the model did not predict the night time ozone concentrations as accurately as it did for the day time. This could be due to other factors that were not explicitly considered in this study. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available