3.9 Article

Maternal progestin intake and risk of hypospadias

Journal

ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
Volume 159, Issue 10, Pages 957-962

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.159.10.957

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. ODCDC CDC HHS [U50 CCU 913241] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Previous studies have suggested that maternal intake of progestins during early pregnancy may be associated with an increased risk of hypospadias. Progesterone and its derivatives are commonly prescribed during early pregnancy, for example, in cases of luteal phase dysfunction and in conjunction with ovulation stimulation drugs. Objective: To examine whether risk of hypospadias was associated with periconceptional progestin intake. Design and Setting: The National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a population-based, multistate, case-control study including deliveries that had estimated due dates from October, 1997 to December, 2000. Participants: Participation in the study was 71% among case mothers and 68% among control mothers. This analysis included 502 subjects diagnosed with second- or third-degree hypospadias (ie, the urethra opened at the penile shaft, scrotum, or perineum) and 1286 male, live-born, nonmalformed control subjects. Results: Forty-two case mothers (8.4%) and 31 control mothers (2.4%) reported any pregnancy-related progestin intake from 4 weeks before through 14 weeks after conception, resulting in an odds ratio of 3.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-6.0). Analyses stratified by several potential covariates also suggested elevated risks. For example, among the 10 cases and 13 controls who did not report any fertility-related procedures or treatments other than progestins, the odds ratio was 2.2 (95% CI, 1.0-5.0). Progestin intake for the purpose of contraception was not associated with increased risk. Conclusion: This study found that pregnancy-related intake of progestins was associated with increased hypospadias risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available