4.7 Article

Atlas-based hippocampus segmentation in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment

Journal

NEUROIMAGE
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 979-990

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.005

Keywords

hippocampus segmentation; Alzheimer's disease; mild cognitive impairment

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P41 RR013642-070061, P41 RR013642-080062, RR019771, P41 RR013642-070062, RR021813, U54 RR021813, R21 RR019771, P41 RR013642] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [P50 AG016570, AG05133, P50 AG005133-239006, P50 AG005133, P50 AG005133-259006, K01 AG030514, P50 AG005133-249006, AG016570, K01 AG030514-01A1, P50 AG005133-229006] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIBIB NIH HHS [R21 EB001561, EB001561] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDA NIH HHS [DA01590001] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIMH NIH HHS [K07 MH001410-04, K24 MH064625, K07 MH001410-05, MH064625, MH01077] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NINDS NIH HHS [T32 NS007391, NS07391] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assesses the performance of public-domain automated methodologies for MRI-based segmentation of the hippocampus in elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Structural MR images of 54 age- and gender-matched healthy elderly individuals, subjects with probable AD, and subjects with MCI were collected at the University of Pittsburgh Alzheimer's Disease Research Center. Hippocampi in subject images were automatically segmented by using AIR, SPM, FLIRT, and the fully deformable method of Chen to align the images to the Harvard atlas, MNI atlas, and randomly selected, manually labeled subject images (cohort atlases). Mixed-effects statistical models analyzed the effects of side of the brain, disease state, registration method, choice of atlas, and manual tracing protocol on the spatial overlap between automated segmentations and expert manual segmentations. Registration methods that produced higher degrees of geometric deformation produced automated segmentations with higher agreement with manual segmentations. Side of the brain, presence of AD, choice of reference image, and manual tracing protocol were also significant factors contributing to automated segmentation performance. Fully automated techniques can be competitive with human raters on this difficult segmentation task, but a rigorous statistical analysis shows that a variety of methodological factors must be carefully considered to insure that automated methods perform well in practice. The use of fully deformable registration methods, cohort atlases, and user-defined manual tracings are recommended for highest performance in fully automated hippocampus segmentation. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available