4.2 Review

A review of sonographic estimate of fetal weight: Vagaries of accuracy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 211-220

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767050500223465

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose. To determine the factors that might influence the accuracy of sonographic estimated fetal weight. Study design. A PubMed search (Jan 1975 to Jan 2003) of articles published in the English language was carried out and the inclusion criterion was that estimates were within 10% of birth weight. A Chi-square test for trend was used and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated. Results. Over 28 years, 175 articles were identified but only 54 (31%) met the inclusion criterion. Overall 62% (8895/14 384) of the predictions were within 10% of the actual weight. The accuracy was significantly different in articles where < 7 vs. > 7 days were allowed to lapse between examination and delivery (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.93, 2.45); where examinations were done by registered diagnostic medical sonographers (RDMS; 65%) versus physicians (59%) or residents (57%; p < 0.0001); in term vs. preterm patients (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.67, 2.13); and in studies with >1000 vs. <1000 cohorts (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.51, 1.74). Conclusions. If feasible the sonographic examination should be done by RDMS and within a week of delivery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available