4.4 Article

Aneuploidy screening in coelomic samples using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH)

Journal

PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 919-926

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1227

Keywords

coelomic fluid; placenta; interphase FISH; aneuploidy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives Coelocentesis is the earliest invasive prenatal diagnostic procedure that has recently been used in ongoing pregnancies to identify single gene defects. Aneuploidy screening has not yet been performed in ongoing pregnancies following coelocentesis, but experimental studies have demonstrated the ability of determining the copy number of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X and Y in uncultured coelomic samples, by FISH or PCR. The aim of this study was to extend previous studies and investigate the feasibility of analysing uncultured coelomic fluid samples for 11 chromosomes using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Methods Coelocentesis was performed in 12 singleton pregnancies at 6 to 9 weeks of gestation immediately before surgical termination of pregnancy. Fluorescence probes for chromosomes 3,7,9,13,16,17,18,21,22, X and Y were applied on uncultured coelomic-fluid samples and placental tissue. In cases where coelomic cells were not of a sufficient amount, chromosomes X and Y were analysed in a second layer of hybridisation. Results Successful analysis by FISH was possible in all cases and the results from the coelomic fluid were concordant with those from the analysis of placental tissue and obtained within a few hours of receiving the samples. Problems associated with limited cell numbers were overcome by the application of a second layer of FISH. This sequential approach has also enabled accurate identification of maternal-cell contamination in male samples. Conclusion Analysis of 11 chromosomes using FISH in coelomic fluid samples is feasible and it has the potential to be applied for rapid aneuploidy screening, should coelocentesis be used clinically as an early, invasive prenatal diagnostic tool. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available