4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

Copper and zinc in silicate and oxide minerals in igneous rocks from the Bingham - Park City Belt, Utah: Synchrotron X-ray-fluorescence data

Journal

CANADIAN MINERALOGIST
Volume 43, Issue -, Pages 1781-1796

Publisher

MINERALOGICAL ASSOC CANADA
DOI: 10.2113/gscanmin.43.5.1781

Keywords

synchrotron X-ray fluorescence; copper; zinc; magnetite; biotite; hornblende; clinopyroxene; feldspar; ilmenite; chlorite.; granitic rocks; Bingham - Park City Belt; Utah

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synchrotron X-ray-fluorescence (SXRF) analyses for Cu, Zn and Fe were carried out on magmatic minerals from intrusive and volcanic rocks in the Bingham - Park City Belt, Utah. The main goals of the study were to determine average Cu and Zn contents and zoning patterns in magmatic minerals in order to shed light on the chemical behavior of Cu and Zn during crystallization of the magmas. The combination of low limits of detection and small analytical footprint makes SXRF the preferred method for tests of this type. Results of the study show that the Zn is homogeneously distributed through most ferromagnesian minerals, commonly following Fe, for which it probably substitutes. The distribution of Cu is more complex, and includes Cu-rich patches of as yet unknown mineralogy that are widespread in all minerals. Median Cu and Zn contents for magmatic minerals, estimated excluding the Cu-rich patches, are lower than and higher than, respectively, those of volcanic rocks in the area. Copper thus must have behaved incompatibly, whereas Zn behaved compatibly during magmatic crystallization. Decreasing Cu concentrations from core to rim were observed in biotite from the volcanic rocks, but Cu and Zn zoning is absent in ferromagnesian minerals in the intrusive rocks. Altered rims on biotite in the intrusive rocks are enriched in Cu and locally in Zn thought to reflect post-crystallization migration of a late magmatic vapor phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available