4.8 Article

Steatohepatitis induced by intragastric overfeeding in mice

Journal

HEPATOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 905-914

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hep.20877

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [P50 AA11999, R37 AA006603] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonalcoholic steatoliepatitis is prevalent among obese individuals with excessive caloric intake, insulin resistance, and type 11 diabetes. However, no animal models exist that recapitulate this important association. This study produced and characterized steatoliepatitis (SH) caused by intragastric overfeeding in mice. C57BL/6, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) type 1 receptor-deficient, and genetically matched wild type mice were fed via an implanted gastrostomy tube a high-fat diet for 9 weeks in the increasing amount up to 85% in excess of the standard intake. Animals were examined for weight gain, insulin sensitivity, and histology and biochemistry of liver and white adipose tissue (WAT). Overfed C57BL/6 mice progressively became obese, with 71% larger final body weights. They had increased visceral WAT, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, hyperleptinemia, glucose intolerance, and insulin resistance. Of these mice, 46% developed SH with increased plasma alanine aminotransferase (121 +/- 27 vs. 13 +/- 1 U/L), neutrophilic infiltration, and sinusoidal and pericellular fibrosis. Obese WAT showed increased TNF alpha and leptin expression and reciprocally reduced adiponectin expression. The expression of lipogenic transcription factors (SREBP-1c, PPAR gamma, LXR alpha) was increased, whereas that of a lipolytic nuclear factor PPAR alpha was reduced in SH. SH was associated with reduced cytochrome P450 (Cyp)2el but increased Cyp4a. TNF type 1 receptor deficiency did not prevent obesity and SH. In conclusion, forced overfeeding with a high-fat diet in mice induces obesity, insulin resistance, and SH in the absence of TNF signaling or Cyp2e1 induction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available