4.5 Article

Epithelial lining fluid solute concentrations in chronic obstructive lung disease patients and normal subjects

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages 1286-1292

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00362.2005

Keywords

exhaled breath condensate; osmolality of airway fluid; cations; urea; osmolality

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01-HL-60057] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDCD NIH HHS [P01-DC-03191] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The exhaled breath condensate (EBC) method represents a new, noninvasive way to detect inflammatory and metabolic markers in the fluid that covers the airways [epithelial lining fluid (ELF)]. However, respiratory droplets represent only a very small and variable fraction of the EBC, most (similar to 99.99%) of which is water vapor. Our objective was to show that ELF concentrations could be calculated from EBC values by using any of three dilutional indicators (urea, total cations, and conductivity) in nine normal and nine chronic obstructive lung disease (COPD) subjects. EBC concentrations of Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, total cations, urea, and conductivity varied over a 10-fold range among individuals, but concentrations of these constituents (except Ca2+) remained well correlated (r(2) = 0.44-0.83, P < 0.001). Dilution (D) of respiratory droplets in water vapor was calculated by dividing plasma concentrations of the dilutional indicators by EBC concentrations. Estimates of D were not significantly different among these indicators, and urea D averaged 10,800 +/- 2,100 (SE) in normal and 12,600 +/- 3,300 in COPD subjects. Although calculated Na+ concentrations in the ELF were less than one-half those in plasma, and concentrations of K+, Ca2+, and Mg2+ exceeded those in plasma, total cation concentrations in ELF were not significantly different from those in plasma, indicating that ELF is isotonic in both normal and COPD subjects. EBC amylase concentrations (measured with an ultrasensitive procedure) indicated that saliva represented <10% of the respiratory (ELF) droplets in all but three samples. Dilutional and salivary markers are essential for interpretation of EBC studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available