Journal
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 253-258Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14767050500246292
Keywords
maternal-fetal medicine; perinatal mortality; gatekeeper; managed care
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective. To assess the effect of sub-specialty prenatal care provided to high-risk obstetrical patients in a community perinatal center as a function of whether consultation and referral to a Maternal-Fetal Medicine (MFM) sub-specialist was at the discretion of the generalist, required by the insurance carrier, or by patient choice. Methods. Demographics, management, and perinatal outcomes for high-risk patients managed exclusively by MFM were compared with those managed by generalists who were later referred to MFM after problems arose. Results. Despite similar demographics, high-risk patients managed exclusively by a single MFM had less prematurity, lower cesarean section rates, fewer low 5-minute Apgar scores (1.3% vs. 5.5%, p < 0.001), and lower perinatal mortality rates (8.0/1000 vs. 47.6/1000, p < 0.001) than those referred at a later date. Conclusions. In this setting, earlier MFM care resulted in better outcomes. These data suggest that the 'gatekeeper' model of generalist to MFM might be better the other way around.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available