4.7 Article

Effects of pharmaceuticals on Daphnia survival, growth, and reproduction

Journal

CHEMOSPHERE
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages 200-207

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.016

Keywords

bioassay; Daphnia; pharmaceuticals; hormesis; sex ratio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pharmaceuticals have been globally detected in surface waters, and the ecological impacts of these biologically-active, ubiquitous chemicals are largely unknown. To evaluate the aquatic toxicity of individual pharmaceuticals and mixtures, we performed single species laboratory toxicity tests with Daphnia magna, a common freshwater zooplankton. We conducted acute (6-day) and chronic (30-day) exposure pharmaceutical bioassays and evaluated survivorship and morphology of adults and neonates, adult length, resting egg production, brood size (fecundity), and the proportion of male broods produced (sex ratio). In general, exposure to a single pharmaceutical in the 1-100 mu g/l range yielded no apparent effects on the normal life processes of Daphnia. However, chronic fluoxetine exposure (36 mu g/l) significantly increased Daphnia fecundity, and acute clofibric acid exposure (10 mu g/l) significantly increased sex ratio. A mixture of fluoxetine (36 mu g/l) and clofibric acid (100 mu g/l) caused significant mortality; the same fluoxetine concentration mixed with 10 mu g/l clofibric acid resulted in significant deformities, including malformed carapaces and swimming setae. Mixtures of three to five antibiotics (total antibiotic concentration 30-500 mu g/l) elicited changes in Daphnia sex ratio. We conclude: (1) individual and mixtures of pharmaceuticals affect normal development and reproduction of Daphnia magna, (2) aquatic toxicity of pharmaceutical mixtures can be unpredictable and complex compared to individual pharmaceutical effects, and (3) timing and duration of pharmaceutical exposure influence aquatic toxicity. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available