4.7 Article

Single agent rituximab in patients with follicular or mantle cell lymphoma:: clinical and biological factors that are predictive of response and event-free survival as well as the effect of rituximab on the immune system:: a study of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

Journal

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages 1675-1682

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdi320

Keywords

rituximab; predictive factors; toxicity; Fc-gamma receptor; follicular lymphoma; mantle cell lymphoma

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Predictive factors of rituximab efficacy and its effect on the immune system are still not defined. Patients and methods: Three hundred and six patients with follicular or mantle cell lymphoma received four weekly doses of rituximab (induction) and no further treatment (arm A) or four more doses at 2-month intervals (arm 13). Results: Response rate to induction was 44%. Independent predictive factors for response were disease bulk < 5 cm, follicular histology, normal hemoglobin and low lymphocyte count. Factors associated with event-free survival (EFS) were having responded to induction, having received not more than one line of therapy, Ann Arbor stage I-III, high lymphocyte count, disease bulk < 5 cm, Fc-gamma receptor genotype VV and receiving prolonged treatment. B cells were suppressed by treatment but recovered after a median of 12 months in arm A and 18 months in arm B. The median IgM level after 1 year was normal in arm A but was decreased to 73% of baseline in arm B. We observed 24 serious adverse events, equally distributed between arms. Ten patients receiving induction only and six patients receiving prolonged treatment developed a second tumor. Conclusions: We defined the characteristics predicting response and EFS to rituximab. Prolonged treatment results in longer EFS at the cost of a longer reduction in B cell and IgM levels, but without additional clinical toxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available