4.1 Article

Amino acid substitutions in core and NS5A regions of the HCV genome can predict virological decrease with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy

Journal

ANTIVIRAL THERAPY
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages 1087-1097

Publisher

INT MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.3851/IMP1674

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MHLW of Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The current standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C is pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy. Recently, it has been reported that amino acid (aa) substitutions in the core region, as well as the IFN-sensitivity-determining region (ISDR), were predictive of non-virological response (NVR), sustained virological response (SVR) and early virological response. Despite the importance of these two predictive factors for combination therapy, their interaction is poorly understood. Methods: A total of 117 patients who were treated with PEG-IFN-alpha 2b plus RBV combination therapy were selected for participation in this study. We determined the aa sequences in the core region and ISDR by direct sequencing and analysed them along with clinical data to indentify predictive factors for therapeutic response. Results: The aa sequences in the core region and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GTP) levels were associated with SVR and NVR, but aa sequences in the ISDR were not. However, substitutions at both aa 70 and aa 91 in the core region without substitutions in the ISDR and higher levels of gamma-GTP were independent predictive factors for NVR. Wild-type aa 70 and aa 91 in the core region, higher platelet counts and lower levels of gamma-GTP were independent predictive factors for SVR. Conclusions: These results indicate that analyses of aa substitutions in both the core region and the ISDR are useful for predicting the effectiveness of combination therapy, and could help to avoid therapy exposure for patients who have a low probability of SVR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available