4.1 Article

Bayesian analysis of allozyme markers indicates a single genetic population of kingklip Genypterus capensis off South Africa

Journal

AFRICAN JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 479-485

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.2989/18142320509504106

Keywords

allozymes; Genypterus capensis; marine fish; population genetics; southern Africa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kingklip Genypterus capensis inhabit deep continental shelf and slope waters off southern Africa and are now largely harvested as a bycatch in trawl and longline fisheries for Cape hakes Merluccius spp. Regional differences in growth, vertebral count and otolith morphology indicate that kingklip may consist of three stocks. In this study, allozyme markers are used to test whether the two southern stocks, the putative Cape and South Coast stocks, are genetically distinguishable. Standard electrophoretic methods detected Mendelian polymorphisms at six (23%) of 26 enzyme-encoding loci in five samples extending from about 29 degrees S on the West Coast to about 25 degrees E on the South Coast. No deviations from Hardy-Weinberg proportions were observed in the samples or in the pooled sample. Gene diversities (heterozygosity) ranged from H-S = 0.039 to 0.042 among samples, and averaged 0.041. Genetic differentiation among localities was remarkably small, F-ST = 0.003, and did not differ significantly from zero. A Bayesian analysis of population structure, based on detecting departures from Hardy-Weinberg proportions and gametic phase equilibria between loci, indicated with a high likelihood that the five samples were drawn from a single genetic population. In combination, these results are consistent with the occurrence of a single population off South Africa. However, the most conservative management strategy is to set harvest quotas individually on the Cape and South Coast stocks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available