4.5 Article

Comparison of extraction procedures and determination of the detection threshold for Clavibacter michiganensis ssp michiganensis in tomato seeds

Journal

PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages 643-649

Publisher

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01230.x

Keywords

bacterial canker; bacterial wilt; PCR; quarantine organism; seedborne disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several seed extraction procedures, used for detection of Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis (Cmm) in naturally infected and artificially infested tomato seed lots were evaluated. Extraction methods that included grinding the seeds were significantly better at detecting the pathogen in three different seed lots than methods that used only soaking. The detection threshold of Cmm in relation to seed sample size was determined by adding naturally infected seeds into samples of three different sizes. Cmm was detected by agar plating assay, on three media (CNS, mSCM, D(2)ANX), and by direct PCR from seeds and Bio-PCR (bacteria cultured on agar media prior to PCR). In samples of 10 000 seeds containing one infected seed, Cmm could be detected only by Bio-PCR and in only one replicate out of five. In samples containing five or 10 infected seeds per 10 000 seeds, three of five and five of five replicates, respectively, were detected by the three detection methods. In samples of 5000 seeds, one infected seed could be detected in all five replicates only after adding a concentration step. A high correlation (R-2 = 0.9448) between artificially infested seeds and the disease incidence was found. Seed lots infested with less than 58 colony-forming units (CFU) per g did not cause disease under glasshouse conditions, whereas lots with about 1000 CFU g(-1) caused disease in 78 plants out of 2000.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available