4.3 Article

Postoperative routine EEG correlates with long-term seizure outcome after epilepsy surgery

Journal

SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages 446-451

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2005.07.007

Keywords

EEG; epilepsy surgery; long-term seizure outcome; predictive factors; TLE; interictal epiteptiform discharges

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the correlation of interictal epileptiform discharges (IED) in routine EEG 6 and 24 months after epilepsy surgery with regard to long-term seizure outcome. In 148 patients (74% temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), 26% extratemporal epilepsy) EEG results (IED present or absent) were correlated with the postoperative outcome using the Engel classification 6 and 24 months after resection (PO6m and PO2y, respectively). Self-evatuation was conducted 3 and 5 years after resection (PO3y and PO5y, respectively). Ninety-one patients (62%) were seizure-free 5 years after resection; 88% of them showed no IED in PO6m. Twenty-eight patients (19%) displayed IED in routine EEG 6 months after resection; 61% of them had recurrent seizures at PO5y, whereas of 120 patients without IED only 33% had recurrent seizures at PO5y; p = 0.01. Absence of IED in PO6m and PO2y correlated with good outcome: 71% without IED remained seizure-free, whereas only 25% with IED at PO6m and PO2y remained seizure-free; p = 0.001. Seizure-free patients (Engel 1) and patients with less favourable outcome (Engel 3-4) at PO6m and PO2y rarely changed categories of outcome during the following years (p < 0.001). Half of the patients with favourable seizure reduction (Engel 2) changed to seizure-free (Engel 1) or to a worse outcome category (Engel 3-4). Postoperative routine EEG is a good prognostic instrument for the prediction of long-term seizure outcome, especially for TLE. It predicts the running up and down of fits in patients with rare seizures (Engel 2). (c) 2005 BEA Trading Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available