4.7 Article

Impaired spatial learning in a novel rat model of mild cerebral concussion injury

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 195, Issue 2, Pages 447-457

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.06.013

Keywords

ADC; animal model; beta APP; diffuse axonal injury; DWI; histology; MAP-2; Morris water maze; MRI; traumatic brain injury

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of the present study was to develop a model of mild traumatic brain injury in the rat that mimics human concussive brain injury suitable to study pathophysiology and potential treatments. 34 male Wistar rats received a closed head trauma (TBI) and 30 animals served as controls (CON). Immediately following trauma, animals lost their muscle tone and righting reflex response, recovering from the latter within 11.4 +/- 8.2 min. Corneal reflex and whisker responses returned within 4.5 +/- 3.0 min and 6.1 +/- 2.9 min, respectively. The impact resulted in a short transient decrease of pO(2) (P < 0.001), increase in mean arterial blood pressure (P = 0.026), and a reduction of heart rate (P < 0.01). Serial MRI did not show any abnormalities across the entire cerebrum on diffusion, T1, T2, and T2*-weighted images at all investigated time points. TBI animals needed significantly longer to locate the hidden platform in a Morris water maze and spent less time in the training quadrant than controls. TBI led to a significant neuronal loss in frontal cortex (P < 0.001), as well as hippocampal CA3 (P = 0.017) and CA1 (P = 0.002) at 9 days after the trauma; however, cytoskeletal architecture was preserved as indicated by normal beta APP- and MAP-2 staining. We present a unique, noninvasive rat model of mild closed head trauma with characteristics of human concussion injury, including brief loss of consciousness, cognitive impairment, and minor brain injury. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available