4.5 Article

Where is the evidence for pancultural self-enhancement? A reply to Sedikides, Gaertner, and Toguchi (2003)

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages 531-538

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.531

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH060155-01A2] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

C. Sedikides, L. Gaertner, and Y. Toguchi (2003) maintained that the self-enhancement motivation (as defined by tendencies to view oneself in overly positive terms) is universal. The present article challenges their claim. A review of the literature revealed that many studies contradict. their findings regarding the domain-specific nature of East Asian self-enhancement. It is argued that Sedikides et al. did not replicate past research because they did not measure self-enhancement in their studies. The present article provides a theoretical basis for understanding cross-cultural differences in self-enhancement and considers the question of universality by exploring 2 different conceptualizations of positive self-regard.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available