4.6 Article

Asymptotic behavior of the unconditional NPMLE of the length-biased survivor function from right censored prevalent cohort data

Journal

ANNALS OF STATISTICS
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages 2109-2131

Publisher

INST MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS
DOI: 10.1214/009053605000000372

Keywords

prevalent cohort; censored data; length-biased sampling; informative censoring; survival function; NPMLE; consistency; weak convergence and asymptotic efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Right censored survival data collected On a cohort of prevalent cases with constant incidence are length-biased, and may be used to estimate the length-biased (i.e., prevalent-case) survival function. When the incidence rate is constant, so-called stationarity of the incidence, it is more efficient to use this structure for unconditional statistical inference than to carry out an analysis by conditioning on the observed truncation times. It is well known that, due to the informative censoring for prevalent cohort data, the Kaplan-Meier estimator is not the unconditional NPMLE of the length-biased survival function and the asymptotic properties of the NPMLE do not follow from any known result. We present here a detailed derivation of the asymptotic properties of the NPMLE of the length-biased Survival function from right censored prevalent cohort survival data With follow-up. In particular, we show that the NPMLE is uniformly strongly consistent, converges weakly to a Gaussian process, and is asymptotically efficient. One important spin-off from these results is that they yield the asymptotic properties of the NPMLE of the incident-case survival function [see Asgharian, M'Lan and Wolfson J. Amer Statist. Assoc. 97 (2002) 201-209], which is often of prime interest in a prevalent cohort Study. Our results generalize those given by Vardi and Zhang [Ann. Statist. 20 (1992) 1022-1039] under Multiplicative censoring, which we show arises as a degenerate case in a prevalent cohort setting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available