4.8 Article

Mutagenic effects of ribavirin and response to interferon/ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages 623-629

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.05.032

Keywords

NS5A; NS5B; ISDR; HCV; HCV dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: To elucidate whether ribavirin acts as a mutagen in the clinical setting and to clarify the relationship between ribavirin-induced mutations and virological response to combined therapy. Methods: Thirty-four patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b received ribavirin monotherapy for 4 weeks, followed by a 24-week course of IFN/ribavirin therapy. HCV mutations during a non-treatment observation period and during subsequent ribavirin monotherapy were determined, and the relationship between mutations and response to subsequent IFN/ribavirin therapy was evaluated. Results: Serum HCV significantly decreased from 6.90 to 6.56 log(10)copy/ml in response to ribavirin monotberapy (P < 0.0001). Nucleotide mutations in the NS5A and NS5B regions occurred during ribavirin monotherapy at a rate of 2.9 X 10(-2)/site/year and 1.3 X 10(-2)/site/year, respectively, a significantly higher rate than the mutation rates during the prior non-treatment observation period (0.60 X 10(-2)/site/year and 0.24 X 10(-2)/site/year, P=0.02, respectively). Mutation rates in the NS5A region were significantly higher in sustained viral responders (SVRs, n=10) than in non-responders (8.8 X 10(-2)/site/Year vs. 0.38 X 10(-2)/site/year, P=0.0005, respectively). In the NS5A region, non-synonymous mutations only occurred in SVRs. Conclusions: Ribavirin may act as a mutagen, and mutations occurring during ribavirin therapy correlate with the virological response to subsequent IFN/ribavirin combination therapy. (c) 2005 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available