4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

How single-trial electrical neuroimaging contributes to multisensory research

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 166, Issue 3-4, Pages 298-304

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2371-1

Keywords

multisensory; electrical neuroimaging; single-trial EEG; inverse solution; ELECTRA; auditory; somatosensory; ERP; LFP

Categories

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [MH49334, MH63434] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study details a method to statistically determine, on a millisecond scale and for individual subjects, those brain areas whose activity differs between experimental conditions, using single-trial scalp-recorded EEG data. To do this, we non-invasively estimated local field potentials (LFPs) using the ELECTRA distributed inverse solution and applied non-parametric statistical tests at each brain voxel and for each time point. This yields a spatio-temporal activation pattern of differential brain responses. The method is illustrated here in the analysis of auditory-somatosensory (AS) multisensory interactions in four subjects. Differential multisensory responses were temporally and spatially consistent across individuals, with onset at similar to 50 ms and superposition within areas of the posterior superior temporal cortex that have traditionally been considered auditory in their function. The close agreement of these results with previous investigations of AS multisensory interactions suggests that the present approach constitutes a reliable method for studying multisensory processing with the temporal and spatial resolution required to elucidate several existing questions in this field. In particular, the present analyses permit a more direct comparison between human and animal studies of multisensory interactions and can be extended to examine correlation between electrophysiological phenomena and behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available