4.7 Article

Post-exposure Vaccination with MP-12 lacking NSs protects mice against lethal Rift Valley fever virus challenge

Journal

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages 135-143

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.03.009

Keywords

Rift Valley fever virus; Post-exposure vaccination; Phlebovirus; Viral hemorrhagic fever; Treatment

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HHSN272201000039I]
  2. NIAID [R01 AI08764301-A1]
  3. Sealy Center for Vaccine Development at UTMB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV) causes severe disease in humans and livestock. There are currently no approved antivirals or vaccines for the treatment or prevention of RVF disease in humans. A major virulence factor of RVFV is the NSs protein, which inhibits host transcription including the interferon (IFN)-beta gene and promotes the degradation of dsRNA-dependent protein kinase, PKR. We analyzed the efficacy of the live-attenuated MP-12 vaccine strain and MP-12 variants that lack the NSs protein as post-exposure vaccinations. Although parental MP-12 failed to elicit a protective effect in mice challenged with wild-type (wt) RVFV by the intranasal route, significant protection was demonstrated by vaccination with MP-12 strains lacking NSs when they were administered at 20-30 min post-exposure. Viremia and virus replication in liver, spleen and brain were also inhibited by post-exposure vaccination with MP-12 lacking NSs. The protective effect was mostly lost when vaccination was delayed 6 or 24 h after intranasal RVFV challenge. When mice were challenged subcutaneously, efficacy of MP-12 lacking NSs was diminished, most likely due to more rapid dissemination of wt RVFV. Our findings suggest that post-exposure vaccination with MP-12 lacking NSs may be developed as a novel post-exposure treatment to prevent RVF. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available