4.5 Review

Mode of action: Yolk sac poisoning and impeded histiotrophic nutrition - HBOC-related congenital malformations

Journal

CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 8-9, Pages 739-745

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10408440591007412

Keywords

development; hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOC); human relevance; placenta

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rodents form an early inverted yolk sac placenta (invYSP) by apposing the yolk sac to the uterine wall. The invYSP supplies nutrients via histiotrophic nutrition involving pinocytosis of materials from uterine gland secretions, lysosomal degradation, and transfer of the products to the embryo. Interference with histiotrophic trafficking through the invYSP by high-molecular-weight molecules (such as trypan blue) causes malformations and resorptions. Later in gestation, rodents form a definitive chorioallantoic placenta (CAP). By contrast, humans and dogs never develop an invYSP, relying exclusively on the CAP. Given their large size (similar to 250 kD), hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOC), being developed as blood substitutes, could be expected to interfere with histiotrophic trafficking through the invYSP. During initial toxicity testing, intravenous infusions of HBOC caused pronounced developmental toxicity in rats exposed during the pre-CAP period. Assuming that HBOC interfered with invYSP function, we hypothesized that these findings would not apply to humans or dogs, which lack an invYSP. Subsequent extensive developmental toxicity studies in dogs produced no developmental toxicity after intravenous infusion at the maximum tolerated dose. In view of the existing species-specific placental differences and HBOC's demonstrated, exclusive interference with invYSP histiotrophic nutrition, HBOC is not expected to cause abnormal development in humans or other mammals that do not develop an invYSP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available