4.4 Review

Cryptorchidism: an indicator of testicular dysgenesis?

Journal

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
Volume 322, Issue 1, Pages 167-172

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-005-1143-3

Keywords

cryptorchidism; testis; Insl3; environment; genetics; testicular dysgenesis; human

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cryptorchidism is a common ailment of new-born boys, affecting 1-9% of full term boys at birth. Cryptorchidism has been associated with an increased risk of testicular cancer and reduced fertility. Aetiology of cryptorchidism remains obscure in most cases. Familial occurrence suggests a heritable susceptibility to cryptorchidism; however, seasonal variation in the incidence of cryptorchidism suggests that environmental factors also contribute. Testicular descent is characterised by androgen-dependent regression of cranial suspensory ligament and androgen + insulin-like hormone 3 (Insl3)-dependent gubernacular outgrowth. Even though hormonal defects are rarely detected in patients, both hypo-and hypergonadotropic hormonal patterns have been associated with cryptorchidism. Moreover, cryptorchid boys have significantly reduced serum androgen bioactivity at 3 months of age when normal boys have a strong surge of reproductive hormones. Defects in Ins13 action cause cryptorchidism in male mice, and over-expression in female mice causes ovarian descent. Defects in leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 8/G-protein-coupled receptor affecting testis descent (LGR8/GREAT), the receptor for lnsl3, manifest the same phenotype as Ins13 knockout mutants. Even though mutations found in Ins13 and LGR8/GREAT genes are not a common cause of cryptorchidism in patients, it remains to be resolved whether low Ins13 levels during development are associated with cryptorchidism. Cryptorchidism may reflect foetal testicular dysgenesis that may later manifest as subfertility or testicular cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available