4.6 Article

Secretin receptors in normal and diseased human pancreas -: Marked reduction of receptor binding in ductal neoplasia

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
Volume 167, Issue 4, Pages 959-968

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61186-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Receptors for gut hormones, which are often overexpressed in cancer, are clinically relevant for receptor-targeted tumor imaging and therapy. Because the receptors for the gut hormone secretin are poorly characterized, we assessed secretin receptor expression in the main secretin target, the human pancreas. We investigated 58 non-neoplastic pancreases and 55 pancreatic tumors for receptor localization and density by in vitro receptor autoradiography using [I-125]Tyr(10) rat secretin and for secretin receptor mRNA by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Secretin receptors were highly expressed in non-neoplastic ducts and lobuli and also in lower amounts in ductal neoplasias, including ductal adenocarcinoma, intraductal papillary mucinous tumors, and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction revealed wild-type receptor mRNA in the nonneoplastic pancreas and both wild-type and spliced variant receptor transcripts in ductal adenocarcinomas. Serous cystic tumors were highly positive for secretin receptors, whereas mucinous cystic tumors were negative. This study is the first to describe the precise secretin receptor distribution in human nonneoplastic pancreas and various pancreatic tumors. High secretin receptor expression in the non-neoplastic ducts reflects the major role of secretin in bicarbonate secretion. Reduced secretin binding in pancreatic ductal tumors may relate to (alternatively spliced) secretin receptor isoforms. Thus, secretinreceptors in pancreatic tumors may represent potential clinical targets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available