4.7 Article

Effects of epigenetic modulation on reporter gene expression: implications for stem cell imaging

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages 106-+

Publisher

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.05-4551fje

Keywords

gene silencing; molecular imaging; stem cell transplant

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [K08 HL074883] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tracking stem cell localization, survival, differentiation, and proliferation after transplantation in living subjects is essential for understanding stem cell biology and physiology. In this study, we investigated the long-term stability of reporter gene expression in an embryonic rat cardiomyoblast cell line and the role of epigenetic modulation on reversing reporter gene silencing. Cells were stably transfected with plasmids carrying cytomegalovirus promoter driving firefly luciferase reporter gene (CMV-Fluc) and passaged repeatedly for 3-8 months. Within the highest expressor clone, the firefly luciferase activity decreased progressively from passage 1 ( 843 +/- 28) to passage 20 ( 250 +/- 10) to passage 40 ( 44 +/- 3) to passage 60 ( 3 +/- 1 RLU/mu g; P < 0.05 vs. passage 1). Firefly luciferase activity was maximally rescued by treatment with 5-azacytidine ( DNA methyltransferase inhibitor) compared with trichostatin A ( histone deacetylase inhibitor) and retinoic acid ( transcriptional activator; P < 0.05). Increasing dosages of 5-azacytidine treatment led to higher levels of firefly luciferase mRNA ( RT-PCR) and protein ( Western blots) and inversely lower levels of methylation in the CMV promoter ( DNA nucleotide sequence). These in vitro results were extended to in vivo bioluminescence imaging (BLI) of cell transplant in living animals. Cells treated with 5-azacytidine were monitored for 2 wk compared with 1 wk for untreated cells ( P < 0.05). These findings should have important implications for reporter gene-based imaging of stem cell transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available