3.8 Article

Gastrointestinal manifestations in severe scorpion envenomation

Journal

GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE
Volume 29, Issue 10, Pages 1001-1005

Publisher

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/S0399-8320(05)88173-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives - To evaluate the type and incidence of gastrointestinal manifestations secondary to scorpion envenomation and their prognostic significance. Patients and methods - All patients admitted to our ICU for scorpion envenomation were included in this retrospective chart review of a 13-year period (1990-2002). Results - During the study period, 951 patients were admitted for scorpion envenomation and 72 (7.6%) died. Ages ranged from 0.5 to 90 years with a mean of 14.7 +/- 17.4 years. Gastrointestinal symptoms were present in 700 patients (73.6%): nausea in 24 (2.5%), vomiting in 687 (72.2%) and diarrhea in 41 patients (4.3%). At univariate analysis, the presence of diarrhea was associated with a fatal outcome (P < 0.05). Diarrhea was also correlated with other indicators of severe envenomation and poor prognosis: respiratory failure (P = 0.01), neurological failure (P < 0.0001), liver failure (P < 0.0001) and low blood pressure requiring catecholamine support (P = 0.02). The multivariate analysis showed that young age (age less than 5 years), fever > 38.5 degrees C, neurological failure and pulmonary edema were independent factors of severity. Digestive disorders were more frequent in children and in this subgroup diarrhea appeared to be associated with poor outcome. In a subset of patients for whom data were available, fatal cases demonstrated significantly higher liver enzymes levels on admission. Conclusion - In Tunisia, gastrointestinal symptoms are often observed in severe scorpion envenomations, especially in young patients. In children, diarrhea and elevated liver enzymes are associated with poor prognosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available