4.4 Article

Growth and yield of all-aged Douglas-fir - western hemlock forest stands: a matrix model with stand diversity effects

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
Volume 35, Issue 10, Pages 2368-2381

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/X05-137

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A density-dependent matrix model was developed for Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) - western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla (Raf.) Sarg.) forest stands in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. The model predicted the number and volume of trees for 4 species groups and 19 diameter classes. The parameters were based on species-dependent equations linking individual tree growth, mortality, and stand recruitment to tree and stand characteristics, including stand diversity in terms of tree species and size. The equations were estimated with individual tree and stand data from 2706 permanent plots in western Washington and Oregon, largely from private and state lands, measured twice at an average interval of 10 years. Other things being equal, diameter growth increased slightly with species diversity and decreased with size diversity. Recruitment increased with species diversity and decreased with size diversity. Mortality was independent of species diversity and tended to increase with size diversity. There was practically no relationship between individual tree volume and species or size diversity. The number of trees predicted by the model over the interval between successive inventories was generally unbiased. Long-term predictions with different initial conditions were consistent with standard yield tables and compared favorably with those of the Forest Vegetation Simulator. The model also implied that, independently of its initial condition, an undisturbed stand would eventually reach a steady state dominated by western hemlock more than 1 m in diameter, with few trees of other species and size.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available