4.7 Article

Macrolide antibiotics inhibit respiratory syncytial virus infection in human airway epithelial cells

Journal

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
Volume 83, Issue 2, Pages 191-200

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.05.003

Keywords

Respiratory syncytial virus; RhoA; Bronchial asthma; COPD; Macrolide

Funding

  1. Abott-Japan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
  2. Taisho-Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Japan
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To examine the effects of macrolide antibiotics on RS virus infection in airways, human tracheal epithelial cells were pre-treated with bafilomycin A(1) and clarithromycin, and infected with RS virus. Viral titers in supernatant fluids and RNA of RS virus, and concentrations of cytokines in supernatant fluids, including interleukin-6 increased with time after infection. Bafilomycin A(1) and clarithromycin reduced viral titers in supernatant fluids of RS virus, RNA of RS virus, the susceptibility to RS virus infection, and concentrations of cytokines induced by virus infection. N-acetyl-S-geranylgeranyl-L-cysteine, an inhibitor for a small GTP binding protein of RhoA, isoform A of the Ras-homologus (Rho) family, an active form of which is associated with RS virus infection via binding to its fusion protein (F protein), reduced viral titers in supernatant fluids and RNA of RS virus. Bafilomycin A(1) and clarithromycin inhibited RhoA activation induced by lysophosphatidic acid in the cells. Fasudil, an inhibitor of Rho kinase, also reduced viral titers in supernatant fluids and RNA of RS virus. These findings suggest that macrolide antibiotics may inhibit RS virus infection, partly through the reduced expression of F protein receptor, activated RhoA, and the inhibition of subsequent Rho kinase activation in human airway epithelial cells. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available