4.7 Article

Procyanidins and butanol extract of Cinnamomi Cortex inhibit SARS-CoV infection

Journal

ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH
Volume 82, Issue 1, Pages 73-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.02.001

Keywords

SARS-CoV; Medicinal herbs; Cinnamomi Cortex; Pseudovirus; Transferrin receptor

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan
  3. Foundation of Heilongjiang Education Committee [1153h09]
  4. Japan Health Sciences Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We found that the butanol fraction of Cinnamomi Cortex (CC/Fr.2) showed moderate inhibitory activity in wild-type severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (wtSARS-CoV) and HIV/SARS-CoV S pseudovirus infections. The inhibition on pseudovirus was also seen in cells pretreated with the CC and CC/Fr.2 (IC50S, 283.4 +/- 16.3 and 149.5 +/- 13.5 mu g/ml, respectively), however the highest activities on wtSARS-CoV were observed when the viruses were treated by the extracts before challenging (IC(50)s, 43.1 +/- 2.8 and 7.8 +/- 0.3 mu g/ml; SIs, 8.4 and 23.1, respectively). Among the compounds fractionated from CC, procyanidin A2 and procyanidin B1 showed moderate anti-wtSARS-CoV activity (IC50S, 29.9 +/- 3.3 and 41.3 +/- 3.4 mu M; SIs, 37.35 and 15.69, respectively). We also sought to determine whether they could interfere with the clathrin-dependent endocytosis pathway using transferrin receptor (TfR) as an indicator. CC/Fr.2 inhibited the internalization of TfR but the procyanidins did not. Taken together, CC/Fr.2 contains unknown substances, that could inhibit the infection, probably by interfering with endocytosis, and it also contains procyanidins that did not inhibit the internalization but inhibited the infection. Therefore, CC extracts contain anti-virus activities that act through distinct mechanisms according to differences in the compounds or mixtures. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available