4.7 Article

Hepatic steatosis in dunnigan-type familial partial lipodystrophy

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 10, Pages 2218-2224

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00234.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: Characterization of familial clusters of subjects with metabolic derangements predisposing to hepatic steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis could facilitate genomic studies to identify risk factors for their development. Dunnigan-type familial partial lipodystrophy (FPLD) is an autosomal dominantly inherited disorder caused by mutations in the LMNA gene. Affected subjects have loss of subcutaneous fat from the extremities and symptoms similar to those characterizing the metabolic syndrome, including insulin resistance and dyslipidemia. The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of steatosis in subjects with FPLD. METHODS: We examined 18 subjects from six families with FPLD for mutations in LMNA and analyzed plasma lipid and serum glucose concentrations. Liver ultrasound and serum aminotransferase activities were used as indicators of steatosis or steatohepatitis. In two subjects, histological examination of hepatic tissue was performed. RESULTS: All subjects had FPLD-causing mutations in LMNA. Plasma lipids were measured in 17 subjects, 16 of whom had hyperlipidemia and 14 presented with either documented insulin resistance or diabetes mellitus. Hepatic steatosis was present in 15 subjects who had ultrasound examinations and 9 of these had elevated serum aminotransferase activities. Liver biopsy confirmed steatosis in 2 subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic steatosis is part of the clinical phenotype of FPLD. This familial disorder may provide a human metabolic model system to facilitate genomic and environmental studies to determine risk factors for hepatic steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available