4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

CO2 capture by activated and impregnated anthracites

Journal

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 14-15, Pages 1487-1502

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2005.01.003

Keywords

anthracite; activation; CO2 adsorption; surface treatment; pore structure; functional group

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Porous materials are being proposed as suitable candidates for CO2 capture due to their highly developed porous structure. Although anthracites are known to produce high surface area activated carbons, there are very limited studies on the application of activated anthracites. Accordingly, in this work, high surface area activated anthracites were prepared by steam activation and their CO2 capacities were investigated. The activated anthracites are mainly microporous. The increase in activation time results in a continuous steady rise of the mesopore area and volume, while the micropore and total pore area and volume reach a maximum at 3 h. The surface areas go through a maximum with increasing solid yields. The adsorption capacity of the activated anthracites decreases rapidly with increasing adsorption temperature, probably due to the adsorption being a physisorption process. The anthracite with the highest CO2 adsorption capacity is the sample activated at 800 degrees C for 2 h, whose surface area was only 540 m(2)/g, and the adsorbed amount Of CO2 was 65.7 mg-CO2/ g-adsorbent, This is probably due to a relationship between microporosity and CO2 physisorption processes. Several surface treatment methods, including NH3 heat treatment and polyethylenimine (PEI) impregnation, were used to modify the surface properties of the activated anthracites in an attempt to increase their CO2 capture capacity at higher temperatures. The surface treatment methods investigated change the porous structure and surface chemistry of the anthracites, and therefore, affect their CO2 capacities. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available