4.2 Article

The influence of smoking and other cofactors on the time to onset to cervical cancer in a southern European population

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 485-491

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.cej.0000174780.44260.32

Keywords

cervical cancer; human papillomavirus; oral contraceptives; Portugal; smoke; time to onset; tobacco

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cervical cancer is a complex and multifactorial disease. Although there are substantial data supporting the causative role of persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in the development of cervical cancer, the complete course of the disease has never been completely understood. Several risk cofactors have been suggested with controversial results. Portugal has the highest incidence of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) within western Europe and there are no known studies regarding the role of cofactors in SCC. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of smoking, sexual behaviour, reproductive and contraceptive history, in the time-to-onset (TTO) of severe cervical lesions (HGSIL/SCC) in the Portuguese population. We verified that age of first sexual intercourse under 18 years (odds ratio (OR) 2.8), pregnancy (OR 2.9), first pregnancy under 21 years (2.6), number of pregnancies (OR 2.3-5.4) and parity (OR 1.9-5.7) are risk factors in the development of cervical neoplasia. Smoke exposure index (SEI) was significantly different (P=0.002) between cases and controls. Our results regarding time-to-onset demonstrate that smoking (P<0.001, log rank test), number of sexual partners (P<0.001, log rank test) and use of oral contraceptives (P<0.001, log rank test) are important determinants in the earlier onset of severe cervical lesions. Using this approach, our findings may help to clarify the role of smoking and other cofactors in the persistence and progression of cervical lesions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available