4.6 Article

Cytokine-induced endothelial arginase expression is dependent on epidermal growth factor receptor

Journal

Publisher

AMER THORACIC SOC
DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.2005-0039OC

Keywords

nitric oxide; pulmonary hypertension; inducible nitric oxide synthase; cell signalling

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-04050] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-57798] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

L-arginine is metabolized to nitric oxide (NO) by NO synthase (NOS), or to urea and L-ornithine by arginase. L-ornithine contributes to vascular remodeling in pulmonary hypertension via metabolism to polyamines and proline. Previously we found that cytokines upregulate both NOS and arginase in pulmonary arterial endothelial cells. We hypothesized that cytokine-incluced arginase I and II expression depend on epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) activity. Bovine pulmonary arterial endothelial cells were treated with lipo-polysaccharicle and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (L/T). L/T treatment resulted in a substantial increase in urea production, and this increase in urea production was potently inhibited by both genistein and AG1478, inhibitors of EGFIR. Levels of arginase I protein and arginase 11 mRNA were increased in response to L/T treatment, and genistein prevented the L/T-induced elevations in both arginase I protein and arginase 11 mRNA levels. L/T treatment increased production of nitrites and inducible NOS mRNA accumulation, and genistein and AG1478 had little effect on these changes. EGF (50 ng/ml) treatment resulted in enhanced urea production. Finally, a 170-KD protein was phosphorylated upon treatment with either EGF or L/T. Our results indicate that arginase induction by L/T depends in part on EGFR activity. We speculate that EGFIR inhibitors may attenuate vascular remodeling without affecting NO release, and thus may represent novel therapeutic modalities for pulmonary hypertensive disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available