4.5 Article

Size distribution of atmospheric aerosols in Kolkata, India and the assessment of pulmonary deposition of particle mass

Journal

INDOOR AND BUILT ENVIRONMENT
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 381-389

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X05057949

Keywords

PM2.5; PM10; aerosol; log-normal distribution; trimodal distribution; ECD; pulmonary deposition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aerosol size distributions were measured at three stations in Kolkata city, during December 2003 to February 2004 using an 8-stage cascade impactor with a back-up filter. Hi-volume samplers were used at the 3 sites for measuring PM2.5 and PM10 concentration. The results showed that the total average number distributed in the size range of 0 to 10 mu m for particulates of size Dp could be represented as a Junge distribution dN/d log(Dp) = 1282.6 (Dp)(-3.803). Aerosol mass distribution by size showed that of the collected fractions most of the PM10 were in the size range of 0<0.43 mu m (15.73%) followed by 0.65<11.1 mu m (15.72%) and then 0.43 < Dp < 0.65 mu m (14.73%). Particle size distributions were trimodal with fine mode Dp<1.1% mu m (MMAD = 0.51 mu m, GSD = 2.15), medium mode 1.1<4.7 mu m (MMAD=2.53 mu m, GSD=1.54) and coarse mode 4.7<10 mu m (MMAD=8.16 mu m, GSD = 1.38). Average concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were in the range of 96.31-363.63 mu g.m(-3) and 140.50-637.70 mu g.m(-3), respectively. Correlation analysis showed that the highest correlation (0.91) was observed between the particle ranges of 9.0-10.0 mu m and 3.3-4.7 mu m followed by 0.89 between 9.0-10.0 and 5.8-9.0 mu m. Regression analysis showed that PM2.5 was about 60% of PM10 concentration. A widely used ICRP model was used to estimate pulmonary deposition. The result showed that 36% of deposited PM10 was accumulated in the alveolar region and nearly 49% of deposited PM10 was accumulated in the tracheobronchial region.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available