4.5 Article

Maternal body condition and plasma hormones affect offspring sex ratio in peafowl

Journal

ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR
Volume 70, Issue -, Pages 745-751

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.12.020

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In theory, females that can afford to do so may increase their fitness by investing in offspring of the sex with the greater probability of attaining high reproductive success. This has been observed in a wide variety of mammalian, reptilian and avian species although the proximate mechanism remains a mystery. Using a captive population of peafowl, Pavo cristatus, we investigated the relation between maternal quality, offspring sex ratio and plasma concentrations of the reproductive hormones testosterone and 17 beta-oestradiol and the principal avian stress hormone corticosterone. Each peacock was paired with three peahens that differed with respect to their relative body condition, creating a condition and dominance hierarchy within each pen and thus a situation in which we would predict investment in offspring to vary between hens. We found significant intercorrelations between maternal body condition (but not dominance rank or clutch size), maternal plasma levels of corticosterone and testosterone (but not 17 beta-oestradiol) and clutch sex ratio, such that good maternal condition, low plasma corticosterone and high levels of testosterone were associated with male biases in the sex ratio and increased investment in male eggs. The observed biases were probably present at laying, and thus add to the growing number of studies showing primary sex ratio adjustment in response to maternal body condition, and furthermore may indicate a role for corticosterone and testosterone in the avian sex manipulation process. (c) 2005 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available