4.7 Article

Regulation of Heart Function by Endogenous Gaseous Mediators-Crosstalk Between Nitric Oxide and Hydrogen Sulfide

Journal

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 2081-2091

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2010.3572

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Singapore Biomedical Research Council [07/1/21/19/509]
  2. Singapore National Medical Research Council [NMRC/1219/2009]
  3. Diabetes Research and Education Centre Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) are two important gaseous mediators regulating heart function. The present study examined the interaction between these two biological gases and its role in the heart. We found that L-arginine, a substrate of NO synthase, decreased the amplitudes of myocyte contraction and electrically induced calcium transients. Sodium hydrogen sulfide (an H2S donor), which alone had minor effect, reversed the negative inotropic effects of L-arginine. The effect of L-arginine + sodium hydrogen sulfide was abolished by three thiols (L-cysteine, N-acetyl-cysteine, and glutathione), suggesting that the effect of H2S + NO is thiol sensitive. The stimulatory effect on heart contractility was also induced by GYY4137, a slow-releasing H2S donor, when used together with sodium nitroprusside, an NO-releasing donor. More importantly, enzymatic generation of H2S from recombinant cystathionine-gamma-lyase protein also interacted with endogenous NO generated from L-arginine to stimulate heart contraction. In summary, our data suggest that endogenous NO may interact with H2S to produce a new biological mediator that produces positive inotropic effect. The crosstalk between H2S and NO also suggests an intriguing potential for the endogenous formation of a thiol-sensitive molecule, which may be of physiological significance in the heart. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 14, 2081-2091.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available