4.7 Review

Using Isoprostanes as Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress: Some Rarely Considered Issues

Journal

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 145-156

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2009.2934

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biomedical Research Council of Singapore [BMRC 03/1/21/18/213, BMRC 04/1/21/19/324]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The measurement of F-2-isoprostanes by methods utilizing mass spectrometry is widely regarded as the best currently available biomarker of lipid peroxidation. F-2-isoprostanes and their metabolites can be measured accurately in plasma, urine, and other body fluids using mass spectrometric techniques, and detailed protocols have been published in several papers. However, many clinical studies and intervention studies with diets or supplements, have employed single spot'' measurements of F-2-isoprostanes on either plasma/serum or urine to estimate oxidative stress.'' This review examines the validity of the common assumption that plasma and urinary F-2-isoprostane measurements are equivalent. It identifies scenarios where they may not be and where spot'' measurements can be misleading, with examples from the literature. We also discuss the controversial issue of whether and how F-2-isoprostane levels in plasma should be standardized against lipids, and, if so, which lipids to use. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 13, 145-156.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available