4.7 Article

Establishment of novel embryonic stem cell lines derived from the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus)

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages 1304-1313

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0366

Keywords

embryonic stem cells; common marmoset; embryoid body; nonhuman primate; teratoma formation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The successful establishment of human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines has inaugurated a new era in regenerative medicine by facilitating the transplantation of differentiated ESCs to specific organs. However, problems with the safety and efficacy of hESC therapy in vivo remain to be resolved. Preclinical studies using animal model systems, including nonhuman primates, are essential to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IIESC therapies. Previously, we demonstrated that common marmosets are suitable laboratory animal models for preclinical studies of hematopoietic stern cell therapies. As this animal model is also applicable to preclinical trials of ESC therapies, we have established novel common marmoset ESC (CMESC) lines. To obtain marmoset embryos, we developed a new embryo collection system, in which blastocysts can be obtained every 3 weeks from each marmoset pair. The inner cell mass was isolated by immunosurgery and plated on a mouse embryonic feeder layer. Some of the CMESC lines were cultured continuously for more than 1 year. These CMESC lines showed alkaline phosphatase activity and expressed stage-specific embryonic antigen (SSEA)-3, SSEA-4, TRA-1-60, and TRA-1-81. On the other hand, SSEA-1 was not detected. Furthermore, our novel CMESCs are pluripotent, as evidenced by in vivo teratoma formation in immunodeficient mice and in vitro differentiation experiments. Our established CMESC lines and the common marmoset provide an excellent experimental model system for understanding differentiation mechanisms, as well as the development of regenerative therapies using hESCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available