4.6 Review

An interpretive history of the cholesterol controversy, part III: mechanistically defining the role of hyperlipidemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIPID RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue 10, Pages 2037-2051

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1194/jlr.R500010-JLR200

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this third installment of the series, we point out that the absence of an explicit, detailed and plausible hypothesis linking hypercholesterolemia to the events in the artery wall was probably an important reason for continuing skepticism and for failure to treat elevated blood cholesterol levels. The rapid advances in understanding of lipoprotein metabolism in the 1950s and 1960s and the application of modern cellular biology in the 1970s provided the context for a modern consensus on pathogenetic mechanisms of atherogenesis. - Steinberg, D. An interpretive history of the cholesterol controversy, part III: mechanistically defining the role of hyperlipidemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available