4.6 Article

Involvement of N-acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase in the degradation of anandamide and other N-acylethanolamines in macrophages

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2005.08.010

Keywords

N-acylethanolamine; N-acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase; anandamide; endocannabinoid; macrophage; fatty acid amide hydrolase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioactive N-acylethanolamines including the endocannabinoid anandamide are known to be hydrolyzed to fatty acids and ethanolamine by fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH). In addition, we recently cloned an isozyme termed N-acylethanolamine-hydrolyzing acid amidase (NAAA), which is active only at acidic pH [Tsuboi, Sun, Okamoto, Araki, Tonai, Ueda, J. Biol. Chem. 285 (2005) 11082-11092]. However, physiological roles of NAAA remained unclear. Here, we examined a possible contribution of NAAA to the degradation of various N-acylethanolamines in macrophage cells. NAAA mRNA as well as FAAH mRNA was detected in several macrophage-like cells, including RAW264.7, and mouse peritoneal macrophages. The homogenates of RAW264.7 cells showed both the NAAA and FAAH activities which were confirmed with the aid of their respective specific inhibitors, N-cyclohexanecarbonylpentadecylamine (CCP) and URB597. As analyzed with intact cells, RAW264.7 cells and peritoneal macrophages degraded anandamide, N-palmitoylethanolamine, N-oleoylethanolamine, and N-stearoylethanolamine. Pretreatment of the cells with CCP or URB597 partially inhibited the degradation, and a combination of the two compounds caused more profound inhibition. In contrast, the anandamide hydrolysis in mouse brain appeared to be principally attributable to FAAH despite the expression of NAAA in the brain. These results suggested that NAAA and FAAH cooperatively degraded various N-acylethanolamines in macrophages. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available