4.0 Article

Association of HLA-DR3 with anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis

Journal

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
Volume 52, Issue 10, Pages 3058-3062

Publisher

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/art.21302

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. Recent data have shown that the most prominent and longest known genetic risk factors for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), HLA-DRB1 shared epitope alleles, are only associated with RA that is characterized by the presence of antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP antibodies) and not with anti-CCP-negative RA. We undertook this study to investigate whether anti-CCP-negative RA is associated with other HLA-DRB1 alleles. Methods. HLA typing was performed for 377 patients from the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic who were diagnosed as having RA within the first year of followup (206 anti-CCP-positive patients and 171 anti-CCP-negative patients), 235 patients who, after 1 year, had undifferentiated arthritis (UA) (28 anti-CCP-positive patients and 207 anti-CCP-negative patients), and 423 healthy control subjects. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for HLA-DRB1 allele frequencies were determined for all patient groups compared with the healthy control group. Results. HLA-DR3 was more frequently present in the anti-CCP-negative RA group than in the control group (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.26-2.67). This was not the case for anti-CCP-positive RA (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.60-1.40). HLA-DR3 was also more frequently present in anti-CCP-negative UA patients (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.10-2.28), but not in anti-CCP-positive UA patients (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.17-1.92). Conclusion. HLA-DR3 is associated with antiCCP-negative arthritis and not with anti-CCP-positive arthritis. These data show that distinct genetic risk factors are associated with the presence of anti-CCP antibodies in RA and indicate that different pathogenetic mechanisms underlie anti-CCP-positive and anti-CCP-negative RA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available