4.6 Article

Cyanobacterial blooms and water quality in Greek waterbodies

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 391-401

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-005-8700-8

Keywords

associations; biovolume; chlorophyll a; Microcystis; risk-assessment; toxin-producing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The cyanobacterial species composition of nine Greek waterbodies of different type and trophic status was examined during the warm period of the year ( May - October). Cyanobacterial water blooms were observed in all waterbodies. Forty-six cyanobacterial taxa were identified, 11 of which are known to be toxic. Eighteen species are reported for the first time in these waterbodies, 8 of which are known to produce toxins. Toxin producing species were found in all of the waterbodies and were primarily dominant in bloom formations ( e. g., Microcystis aeruginosa, Anabaena flos-aquae, Aphanizomenon flos-aquae and Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii). Cosmopolitan species ( e. g., M. aeruginosa), pantropic ( e. g., Anabaenopsis tanganyikae) and holarctic species ( e. g., Anabaena flos-aquae) were encountered. Shallow, eutrophic waterbodies had blooms dominated by Microcystis species and were characterized by phytoplankton association M. Anabaena and Aphanizomenon species of association H were dominant in waterbodies with low dissolved inorganic nitrogen and thermal stratification in the summer. Total cyanobacterial biovolumes (CBV) ranged from 7 to 9,507 cm(3) m(-3) and were higher than Alert Level 2 and Guidance Level 2 (10 cm(3) m(-3); World Health Organization; WHO) in seven of the waterbodies. Chlorophyll a concentrations ranged from 6 to 90,000 mg m(-3) and were higher than Alert Level 2 and Guidance Level 2 ( 50 mg m(-3); WHO) in eight of the waterbodies. There is also an elevated risk of acute toxicosis ( Guidance Level 3; WHO) in five waterbodies. Water of an undesirable quality, hazardous to humans and animals occurs in several Greek waterbodies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available