4.5 Review

Social support in diabetes: a systematic review of controlled intervention studies

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 1-12

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.11.001

Keywords

type 2 diabetes; social support; intervention; self-care; outcomes; review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systematic, computerized search in Medline, the Cochrane Library, Eric, PsychINFO and Embase files, 1980-2003, selecting descriptions of prospective intervention trials with good methodological design, testing effects of social support interventions on health outcomes in primary and outpatient care for type 2 diabetes. Six controlled trials were reviewed. They defined, modified, and measured social support in various ways, and scored outcomes with varying measures. Gender differences and the right amount of support seem important. Promising new forms of social support: group consultations (better HbA1c and lifestyle), Internet or telephone-based peer support (improved perceived support, increased physical activity, respectively), and social support groups (improved knowledge and psychosocial functioning). No improved diabetes control by classic forms of support, e.g. from spouse (but weight loss in women) and family and friends (no differences). It is tentatively concluded that this review supports the hypothesis that specific social support interventions affect patient self-care and diabetes outcomes. New forms of social support may be discussed and incorporated in the work of diabetes teams, and offered to patients as new possibilities to help them adjust to a life with (type 2) diabetes and make information-based decisions. Only in the group consultations study, diabetes control was protected. More well-designed research testing the effects of specific social support interventions on patient self-care, lifestyle adaptations, and outcomes of diabetes care, is warranted. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available