4.6 Article

Spatial and temporal variability in sediment denitrification within an agriculturally influenced reservoir

Journal

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages 85-111

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-005-2199-6

Keywords

agriculture; denitrification; nitrogen; reservoir; river; sediments

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reservoirs are intrinsically linked to the rivers that feed them, creating a river - reservoir continuum in which water and sediment inputs are a function of the surrounding watershed land use. We examined the spatial and temporal variability of sediment denitrification rates by sampling longitudinally along an agriculturally influenced river - reservoir continuum monthly for 13 months. Sediment denitrification rates ranged from 0 to 63 mu g N2O g ash free dry mass of sediments (AFDM)(-1) h(-1) or 0 - 2.7 mu g N2O g dry mass of sediments (DM)(-1) h(-1) at reservoir sites, vs. 0 - 12 mu g N2O gAFDM(-1) h(-1) or 0 - 0.27 mu g N2O gDM(-1) h(-1) at riverine sites. Temporally, highest denitrification activity traveled through the reservoir from upper reservoir sites to the dam, following the load of high nitrate (NO3--N) water associated with spring runoff. Annual mean sediment denitri. cation rates at different reservoir sites were consistently higher than at riverine sites, yet significant relationships among theses sites differed when denitrification rates were expressed per gDM vs. per gAFDM. There was a significant positive relationship between sediment denitri. cation rates and NO3--N concentration up to a threshold of 0.88 mg NO3-- N l(-1), above which it appeared NO3--N was no longer limiting. Denitrification assays were amended seasonally with NO3--N and an organic carbon source ( glucose) to determine nutrient limitation of sediment denitri. cation. While organic carbon never limited sediment denitrification, all sites were significantly limited by NO3--N during fall and winter when ambient NO3--N was low.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available