4.2 Article

Electro-clinical and imaging characteristics of focal cortical dysplasia: Correlation with pathological subtypes

Journal

EPILEPSY RESEARCH
Volume 67, Issue 1-2, Pages 25-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2005.07.013

Keywords

electro-clinical and imaging characteristics; focal cortical dysplasia; pathological subtypes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction:: Focal cortical dysplasia (CD) is a common cause of pharmacoresistant epilepsy. CD is due to abnormalities in neuronal migration, proliferation, and/or differentiation that result in four distinct pathological subtypes: 1A, 1B, 2A, and 2B. In order to provide clinical correlation to these pathological subtypes, we reviewed the electro-clinical and imaging characteristics and surgical outcomes of the four pathological subtypes of CD. Methods:: We retrospectively reviewed patient data from epilepsy surgeries at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between 1990 and 2002. Only those patients with the definite pathological diagnosis of isolated cortical dysplasia were included in the study (n = 145). Results:: Pathological subtypes 2A and 2B were predominantly frontal in location, and had a more severe epilepsy syndrome with lower intelligence quotient scores than subtypes 1A and 1B. Patients with subtype 1A FCD had less severe, later onset epilepsy that was predominantly located in the temporal lobe. Risk factors for epilepsy included febrile seizures for type 1A, head trauma for types 1A and 1B, and perinatal adverse events for type 2B. Type 2B demonstrated significantly more FLAIR signal abnormalities than the other groups. Sixty-three percent of patients overall had an Engel I outcome at 6 months follow-up. The best outcomes were in the 2B subtype, and in those who did not require an invasive EEG evaluation. Conclusions:: Clinically important differences exist between the pathological subtypes of CD, which may assist in their management, and provide further insight into their underlying pathophysiology. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available